Going the extra mile on the information highway...

Costs of running a VM (Hyper-V vs VMWare)

I was recently in a debate with an IT Pro about Hyper-V and VMWare. I can't name him as i have not asked for his permission to be named here. He's been using VMWare for quite a while and he was seriously pissed when Microsoft released Hyper-V. I take it in a good way.

We were trying to argue who will be cheaper and he brought up a formula on how he calculates if Hyper-V or VMWare is cheaper. In a similar fashion, i stumbled on a blog entry by a MSFTie which discusses this with all the algebras.

He is James O'Niel. Here's his blog. http://blogs.technet.com/jamesone/archive/2008/03/15/vmware-running-hot-enough-to-cook-the-figures.aspx

Please read his blog and you'll find it very interesting to know that Hyper-V is indeed cheaper, even though Hyper-V doesn't allow us to overcommit the memory for a VM.

/Dennis

» Similar Posts

  1. Want that agility in computing? O2Micro did it with Virtualization
  2. Battle Stations, a PHP app, runs better on Windows Server 2008, IIS7
  3. Microsoft.Com goes virtual... the Hyper-V way

» Trackbacks & Pingbacks

    No trackbacks yet.

» Comments

    There are no comments.

Comments are closed